Latest on DC Schemes in UK

  • expat
  • 10/10/08 31/05/09
  • unspecified
  • Offline
Posted: Fri, 08/05/2009 - 04:13

By Mathieu Robbins, The Independent
Wednesday, 1 April 2009

The Financial Services Authority yesterday suggested boosting the amount savers can have guaranteed by the Government if the bank they have made the deposit with goes bankrupt.

The proposal is meant to protect customers temporarily holding large sums through one-off transactions such as property sales, inheritances, divorce settlements, pension lump sum payments, or redundancy.

"Our proposals will protect people who have little or no choice about holding a high balance for a limited period," the FSA's banking director, Thomas Huertas, said.

Separately yesterday, the FSCS, which compensates customers who lose money when a financial services firm collapses, said the annual charge taken from financial firms over the next year will be £156m, as banks continue to pay the cost of the credit crunch.

Still, in a rare positive surprise for lenders, the levy set by the scheme for 2009-2010 is lower than the £186m that the FSCS predicted it would be in its annual report in February.

In addition to this charge, financial firms that take in customer deposits will also have to contribute £406m towards the interest on government loans to cover the cost of compensating customers for the five bank defaults that have taken place in the past year. However, this sum is also lower than the £435m figure previously predicted, due to recent interest rate reductions.

"While most sub-classes will see no change from the indicative levies we published in our plan and budget for 2009-10, we recognise that the levy comes at a very difficult time for firms," Loretta Minghella, the FSCS's chief executive, said. "They can rest assured that we have taken steps to avoid over-levying and to contain our costs."

The FSCS has recently paid compensation to savers who had cash stored with the internet bank Icesave, as well as the collapsed lenders Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander and Bradford & Bingley.

Your rating: None Average: 4.3 (3 votes)

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

@expat: Further to the above.....

  • follow_the_tao
  • 11/10/08 31/05/09
  • a depositor
  • Offline
  • Fri, 08/05/2009 - 07:11

This document is available from the "Facts", "Timeline of Events" public site menu:

If I am correct, in a statement within the last few days Allan Bell has stated there will be no consideration of changes to the DCS within the forseeable future, I can't find the link at this moment.

I posted this news item recently, the important paragraph is the third::

I would also suggest you look at the House of Keys order paper for the 5th May and listen to this iom radio recording of the session, link (I suppose it will be current until the coming Monday) :

I spoke to someone in the IoM last week for 90 minutes, they mentioned things like the Edwards report, you will hear hear mention of the that report within the pertinent section from 04 minutes to minutes 25.

I was puzzling over your post that was after a post by IceCrusher, that was subordinate to my original post.
I had the feeling that within the post was lurking a scorpion like comment. I still have that sensation. If you want to talk mail me. I do not like ennui. I am very direct. I know some of your history, I see some of the current confusion. Please don't try, again, to confuse things. I await your response.